Navigating Mismatched Paths: Lived Experiences of Graduate Students in Career Track Transitions from Junior High to Senior High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17062499Keywords:
career track mismatch, K to 12 transition, career guidance program, academic decision-making, senior high school tracksAbstract
This study explored the lived experiences of senior high school graduates who encountered mismatches between their chosen and preferred academic tracks under the K to 12 curriculum in the Philippines. Using a qualitative, phenomenological design within an interpretivist paradigm, the research examined how students made decisions regarding track selection, the factors influencing these choices, and the consequences on their educational and career trajectories. Data were gathered through in-depth, semi-structured interviews with ten participants, supported by field notes and reflective journaling to ensure authentic and nuanced interpretation.
Findings revealed that mismatches stemmed primarily from systemic barriers such as limited school offerings, financial constraints, and geographic inaccessibility, compounded by inadequate career guidance at the junior high school level. Social and familial pressures further influenced decisions, often overriding students’ personal interests and aspirations. Lacking structured support, many students relied on informal advice or self-research, leading to uncertainty and reduced autonomy in decision-making. Despite these challenges, participants demonstrated resilience and adaptability, underscoring the need for early, individualized, and comprehensive career counseling.
To address these gaps, the study proposes “CAREER READY: A Structured Career Guidance and Track Alignment Program for Junior High School Students.” This program integrates interest and aptitude assessments, seminars, parental engagement, and immersion activities to guide students toward well-informed and goal-aligned track choices. The study concludes that strengthening career orientation programs and expanding access to diverse strands are critical for reducing mismatches, enhancing student self-efficacy, and ensuring alignment between educational pathways and future aspirations.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aloysian Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, Education, and Allied Fields

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.