Cause And Effect of Job Stress on Employees’ Performance of JSOG, Armed Forces of the Philippines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17138530Keywords:
Job Stress, Military Personnel, Joint Special Operations Group (JSOG), Soldier Performance, Mental HealthAbstract
Occupational stress remains a pressing issue in the military because it affects not only the performance of soldiers but also their health and overall morale. While stress has been widely studied in the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), there is limited attention given to specialized combat units such as the Joint Special Operations Group (JSOG). These soldiers face unique challenges—continual deployments, high-risk missions, and constant exposure to stressful and dangerous mission. This study was designed to assess both the causes and effects of job stress among JSOG personnel, to determine how demographic factors such as age, sex, rank, and length of service influence stress perception, and to examine the relationship between stressors and their impact on job performance.
The research employed a quantitative descriptive design and involved 120 JSOG personnel between June 2024 and March 2025. A validated questionnaire was used, and ethical protocols such as informed consent and confidentiality were strictly followed. Descriptive statistics were applied to describe the respondents’ profiles and stress levels, while correlation analysis was used to test relationships between causes and effects of stress.
Results showed that JSOG personnel experienced high stress due to operational pressure, long deployments, exposure to trauma, and demanding tasks. Stress was found to affect soldiers in four areas—cognitive function, emotional stability, physical health, and motivation at work. Demographic characteristics also influenced how stress was perceived. Importantly, a significant relationship was confirmed between the causes of stress and their negative impact on job performance.
The study concludes that work-related stress weakens morale and reduces efficiency, particularly among mid-career non-commissioned officers who represent the frontline of AFP operations. It recommends stronger mental health and resilience programs, adjustments in deployment systems, and leadership training for early recognition of stress. These measures can help the AFP protect its personnel, sustain performance, and maintain mission readiness in line with the Sustainable Development Goals.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aloysian Interdisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, Education, and Allied Fields

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
